Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:03:55 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Frank,
> how many people would have known (and used the fact)
> that current inputenc latin1 actually has
>
> \DeclareInputText{189}{\textonehalf} % so that gives an error if placed in
> % math
>
> but
>
> \DeclareInputMath{185}{\mathonesuperior}
> would that also make an uproar on ctt? i.e., changing the inputencs to be text
> objects by default
I do not yet understand whether there are any strong objections to
making them work in both modes, e.g.,
\ifmmode \frac 12 \else \textonehalf \fi or, resp.,
\ifmmode ^1 \else \textonesuperior \fi
The strict division suggests that something is very wrong with this.
What?
--
Karsten Tinnefeld [log in to unmask]
Fachbereich Informatik, Lehrstuhl 2 T +49 231 755-4737
Universität Dortmund, D-44221 Dortmund, Deutschland F +49 231 755-2047
|
|
|