LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:41:31 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: name of the current system
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown
From: Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (30 lines) 
Joseph Wright writes:
 > On 10/02/2011 08:04, Arno Trautmann wrote:
 > > Hi all,
 > > 
 > > I was wondering how to refer to a TeX system that uses expl3 and the
 > > xpackages. In concreto, I want to add a line like "typeset with *TeX*"
 > > to my thesis.
 > > The first * is easy: luaLa. Now, the second one: Is it still just
 > > LaTeX2$,1'5(B? Or something like LaTeX2$,1'5(B/3? Or "LaTeX2$,1'5(B with expl3 packages"?
 > > 
 > > What's your oppinion on this?
 > > 
 > > cheers
 > > Arno
 > > 
 > 
 > Personally, I'd stick with LaTeX2$,1'5(B: after all, you don't usually list
 > all of the packages you use, and currently expl3 is just another package.

well, it is a bit more than JAP, isn't it. you are right it is still within 2e
but but it provide some quite different approach and if Arno likes to
acknowledge it I think this is nice.

The working title we have for the expl3 implementation on top of LaTeX2e is
"l3in2e" but perhaps that's difficult to understand. So I would perhaps go for

  LaTeX2e with expl3 extensions

frank

ATOM RSS1 RSS2