LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mittelbach, Frank" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:00:34 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all production files for one type of task in one directory rather than in 2 and not find, say babel.def in generic but babel.sty in latex, but I guess there are arguments for both

cheers
frank 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Karl Berry
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 01:35
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01

    Regarding babel, I don't understand, why some TeX distributions
    put *all* files below TDS/*/generic/, from my readme.txt:

There is no deep reason behind it for TL -- the ctan2tds.pl kind of steers one in the direction of choosing a single format
(latex/generic/whatever) for a package.  Exceptions take more code.
Can't say why for teTeX and vtex.

I agree that it would be better to use tex/latex/babel and tex/generic/babel as appropriate.

When it is time to update TL, I hope to use your bundles and then everything will be better.

Thanks,
Karl

ATOM RSS1 RSS2