LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:30:57 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>; from Sebastian Rahtz on Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 11:47:09PM +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 11:47:09PM +0100, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:

> John Palmer ([log in to unmask]) writes:
>
>  > [1] in the short and medium term it is easier to get authors to write
>  > LaTeX than to write SGML;
>
> and about a million times easier again to get them to write in Word,
> as 99% of them probably do :-}

I assumed that these "standard journal macros" were aimed mainly
at mathematical (or at least scientific) journals?

I have never seen a research article in mathematics written in Word.

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2