LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:02:32 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Joseph Wright a écrit :
> Will Robertson wrote:
>> If you're unsure about .set:N, perhaps it's better to drop it for now. I
>> mean, *I* like it, but others have had mixed reactions. (You've been
>> looking at l3keys recently, Manuel? Any thoughts?)
>
Unfortunately not, I was busy preparing the beginning of courses at university,
so I did less expl3-playing than I expected. However...

> Probably a good idea. I'd prefer to have something we can all agree
> stays, then add .set:N back later if it is wanted.  Expect an update later.

On general principles, I think it's indeed better to add things later than
remove things later :-)

Manuel.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2