LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:13:27 +0000
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 Feb 2001 22:50:15 +0100." <v03110700b6aa13b0f08b@[]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (27 lines)
hans aberg (wouldn't you know) writes:

> If one carries out your argument, then there should be no math environment.

here we go again.

we _can't_ do without a maths environment, because tex is coded in
such a way that it's as near absolutely essential as makes no

> If one leaves numbers out in a text mode, then those that want to use
> numbers will have to do some additional markup, be it "math" or "phone" or
> whatever.

having markup to encase digits in text is often useful; i agree.
phone numbers are a case in point.

however, i would fight hard indeed against your crazy suggestion that
we need to mark up (for example) quantities written numerically

 "... there are between three and \mathematicalnumber{20} of these
      creatures, according to the time of day..."

complete lunacy, imo.