> Judging by Hans Aberg's reply, there is perhaps a misunderstanding of
> the purpose of this list.
> It is for discussion of principles and requirements of LaTeX3, a major
> new system, not that of refinements or bug-fixes to LaTeX2e.
> So maybe, since the LaTeX3 Project Team does both of these, perhaps we
> should change its description from:
A rose, by any other name.... I think most people on the list know what
it's for and aren't confused by the name of the list. As the two are
related, I think the discussion of both is appropriate here.
I hear lots of rumours about TeX's successors. How much longer will
something like the current TeX/LaTeX continue to be developed? Will
there be a branching of different lineages, with all continuing, at
least for a while, or will all but one die out/be killed?
Where is a good description of the goals of LaTeX3 and differences to
LaTeXe? How long will the TeX/LaTeX/BibTeX/DVIPS/PostScript/CUSTOM-BIB/
NATBIB combination continue to exist in something like its present form?
Of course, no one can predict the future; I'm thinking about plans and
Phillip Helbig Email ......... [log in to unmask]
Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories Tel. .... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297)
Jodrell Bank Fax ................ +44 1477 571 618
Macclesfield Telex ................ 36149 JODREL G
UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL Web ... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/