Actually I don't think this is a workable idea, the LUG's are not able to
fulfill that role in my eyes. In my believe the suggested maintenance clause
that allows to give packages to the community is more likely to work out.

btw i expect a new draft to be ready during this month
frank

ps sorry for the mail style :-( this is outlook at its best

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Schröder [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 16:46
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Fiduciary Licence Agreement V1.0


See http://fsfeurope.org/projects/fla/fla.en.html

I don't want to start another discussion on the pros and cons of
the LPPL with this.

But the idea of Copyright Assignments for (La)TeX packages should
be discussed. And instead of the FSF think of you favorite LUG or
the AMS. :-)

Best regards
        Martin