LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 13:48:33 +0000
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 09 Nov 1998 13:43:51 GMT." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (16 lines)
> Sorry, I wasn't thinking about the equivalent of the Fortran programmer,
> but rather the equivalent of the Fortran compiler writer, who probably
> DOES need a real copy of the standard.

which is why, by and large, commercial-quality compilers come to be
written by commercial outfits, to whom a few hundred quid on acquiring
the relevant standards is peanuts.

in any case, standardisation of xml and xsl isn't being done by iso
(unless iso gets an access of common sense some time soon, it's not
going to get a look in, even).  w3c standards are all freely
available, so that this whole sub-thread of the discussion is a
non-issue.

r

ATOM RSS1 RSS2