LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Kastrup <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:44:37 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Jonathan Fine <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> Hi
>
> Early on, LaTeX sets basic character codes. Perhaps if, at the same
> time, it also executed
>
>     \catcode`<13
>     \expandafter\let\expandafter<\string <
>
> then Benedikt 's problem would go way. Or could more easily be solved.
>
> I don't see any fundamental reason why this would not work.

I did not expect this suggestion from the author of ActiveTeX.

ERROR: Missing = inserted for \ifnum.

--- TeX said ---
<to be read again> 
                   <
l.3 \message{\ifnum2<
                     3 good\else bad\fi}
--- HELP ---
From the .log file...

I was expecting to see `<', `=', or `>'. Didn't.


Were you thinking of

\edef<{\string<}

instead?

-- 
David Kastrup

ATOM RSS1 RSS2