LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Functions with no arguments
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:17:13 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
Hello all,

A "philosophical" question.  To make various bits of code clearer, I'm
in the habit of splitting self-contained parts off.  Sometimes, this
results in functions which take no arguments.  Under the LaTeX3 scheme,
is it "acceptable" to have functions of no arguments rather than tlps
containing the data?
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2