LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:30:55 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Assorted suggestions pt. 1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From: Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (32 lines) 
On 15/02/2010 00:19, Will Robertson wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Thanks for the feedback; these suggestions are great.
> I've got a couple of short queries below.
>
> On 15/02/2010, at 10:35 AM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
>
>> - maybe some wrappers around LaTeX-2 conditionals, but that is syntactic sugar
>
> You meant for functionality that doesn't yet exist in expl3?
> Can you be more specific?

I think this means things to used switches as defined by \newif.
>
>> - key-value option processing with l3keys
>
> What's missing?

Perhaps Phillip has not seen l3keys2e.

>> - dedicated stack and queue datatypes that hide their implementation
>
> Can you go into more detail about what is deficient in l3seq for this?

I think we are getting at "concepts" here: something like \cs_set_eq:NN 
\stack_new:N \seq_new:N, ...

(Late here: will read full mail more carefully soon!)

Joseph

ATOM RSS1 RSS2