LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Timothy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jul 1998 04:04:15 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]> from Frank Mittelbach at "Jul 2, 98 09:40:51 pm"
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> fine, however you could take the exercise further and actually apply
> some of the functionality of L3PL. i've appended my version below

Thank you for your example.
At least I now understand (roughly)
what all the philosophical discussion was about.

However, I am still puzzled by the purpose of it all.
The new xr.sty is manifestly more difficult to follow
than its predecessor.
So who is meant to benefit ?
The user, the package writer, ... ?
And what exactly is the benefit ?

(I'd be grateful for an explanation not using the word "module",
which makes my head dizzy.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2