Morten Høgholm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Another quesition, I'm afraid. In the main, I get the impression :w
>> macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one.
>> However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c
>> (= \@nameuse). I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there
>> a reason for avoiding this?
> There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe).
Ah yes. This does not show up in the copy of source3.pdf I compiled
from the SVN over the weekend. Is it documented?