Chris Rowley writes:
> What we have not done yet, due to `stafff shortages', is any detailed
> work on building the requirements of multi-use documents (via hyperef
> or any other pakage) into the new experimental work that I am sure you
> are all right now busily testing.
Is it correct to assume that "multi-use" in the context of LaTeX 3
documents refers only to (1) regular latex and (2) pdflatex?
If so, is it agreed that broader senses of "multi-use" would stretch
LaTeX, the language (as it will be in LaTeX 3), too far?