## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

#### View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font

Subject:

Re: New template macro families

From:

Date:

Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:04:56 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (40 lines)
 > but no new naming scheme was specified. sorry. I got tied up in MathML2 (and Frank in unicode issues, judging by this weekends activity on th elist:-) Yes your names definitely seem better than the old ones. It would be possible I suppose to make it even harder to "accidentally" create these names by having mismatched } in the names rather than {} pairs which are still easy to enter in commands that pass their argument to csname: *\begin{a{b}c} ! LaTeX Error: Environment a{b}c undefined. I thought that was what you had originally suggested? so where you have  Current name: \describecsfamily{TP@<\meta{type}>}   New name: \describecsfamily{TP@T{\meta{type}}} ie a name of the form \csname TP@T{xxx}\endcsname you could have names \csname TP@T}xxx}\endcsname Thoughts? David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp