Frank Mittelbach writes:
> Sebastian wrote:
> > > but it doesn't go all the way and I guess something like
> > > LaTeX still has a place in the game; so far I don't quite
> > > believe in XSL engines that drive a
> > quite. this is a criticism of XSL Formatting Objects, not XML or
> > Unicode, which is the core consideration.
> indeed. my criticism of Unicode is in other areas. however unicode
> is a fact and as such better as nothing.
Frank, I am trying right now (after being away for a while) to update
the multilingual encodings summary. I think you have hinted at
imperfections of Unicode more than once. Do you have any concrete
points that are interesting/relevant to this discussion, which I could
add to the document?