LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font

Subject:

Re: cons & the 2e testsuite

From:

Date:

Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:55:15 +0930

Content-Type:

multipart/signed

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (29 lines) , smime.p7s (29 lines)
 On 29/04/2009, at 12:10 AM, Will Robertson wrote: > Hi, > > Regarding tlb3752e.tlg, Morten had this to say: > >> This is very wrong. The e in the testfile is to signal that it is >> running with eTeX extensions and so \TextOrMath is a protected macro. >> With the new test apparently this does not hold anymore so the >> question is whether the test suite is run with eTeX extensions on? > > That was indeed the case; I've updated the cons script and the test > now passes for this file; we're down to six. Hi all, Sorry for the random message above; it wasn't supposed to come to this list :) In looking to make the changes proposed for \in@, I realised that I hadn't set up the test suite yet on my machine; before we can commit anything new, we need to work through the few remaining test files that starting causing errors when we moved over to the new SVN repository and the new test suite build system. Cheers, Will