## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

#### View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font

Subject:

Re: \in@ wrong?

From:

Date:

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:29 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (13 lines)
 On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > The tendency seems to be not to change the internals of LaTeX2e, but I'd be > happy to replace the current implementation of \in@ with a more correct > version. What do others think? If others are amenable to the change, would > you be willing to write the new version? Unless I am completely mistaken, writing a new version is a simple task: just make the second argument start with something that should not appear in input, such as a the nil marker. -- Morten