## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

#### View:

 Message: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Topic: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] By Author: [ First | Previous | Next | Last ] Font: Proportional Font

Subject:

Re: \leavevmode?

From:

Date:

Sat, 31 Dec 2011 12:51:01 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

 text/plain (39 lines)
 Am Fri, 30 Dec 2011 21:31:36 +0000 schrieb Joseph Wright: >>> what is the recommended way to issue a \leavevmode in latex3? >> I guess the answer is not yet. Eventually the underlying concept should >> be part of the galley module. But how this will provided in the end >> depends a little bit on how far we take this module. There have been two >> different implementations initially with somewhat different concepts and >> the new one by Joseph implements some but not all of the original one >> (for good reasons I would say).   > In some parts of the coffin code, we do this 'directly' using   > \hbox_unpack:N \c_empty_box Well I thought about   \hbox_unpack_clear:N\c_empty_box (as the documentation of source3 says that \hbox_unpack_clear:N is \unhbox). And as I can see l3galley uses   \tex_unhbox:D \c_empty_box. Is there any real difference between the three variants? And is the name in l3galley "\galley_leave_vmode:" stable? I would prefer a standard command instead of my own local \leavemode-command. \leavemode is imho such a central concept that it should have a standard name. I wish you all a happy new year! -- Ulrike Fischer