Chris Rowley writes:
> For Micorosoft it would appear to be a major step towards a more
> civilised approach to the world ... except that they maybe see it as
> pulling Elsevier into their view of the future?
neither. it means they both want to `own' science and sell us back our
> > but the Microsoft/Elsevier/SGML
> > bandwagon is, I would argue, rather more wide-ranging.
> But is it as useful to the research physicists? (I have no idea.)
if their stuff gets in there, yes; Science Direct is as good or better
than xxx, isnt it?
> In what units: are Elsevier prepared to reveal their data on such things?
well, we publish (say) 1200 journals, at (say) an average of 50
articles a year, so say 6000 articles a year? 10000? is that a lot?