At 11:49 +0100 98/10/17, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>latex's syntax has a little bit of regularity, a little bit of block
>structure, ..., but all told it's so uneven that it's silly to imagine
>`formally' specifying it.
Whatever, it is important one makes up one's mind and make that explicit.
>added to which, the extreme difficult of faulting tex primitives,
>etc., that fall outside the scope of the syntax makes the utility of
>such a specification doubtful.
I have noted that some tools, such as spell-checkers, are dependant on a
LaTeX syntax (not working properly if using merely PlainTeX).
* Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
* Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
* AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>