LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for LATEX-L Archives


LATEX-L Archives

LATEX-L Archives


LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LATEX-L Home

LATEX-L Home

LATEX-L  February 1999

LATEX-L February 1999

Subject:

Suggestion: Safe font commands

From:

Lars Hellström <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 22 Feb 1999 14:10:49 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (92 lines)

It occured to me some while back that there is a need for some kind of
"safe" font selection commands---where "safe" is to be interpreted as with
the safe file commands \InputIfFileExists etcetera---in LaTeX. Safe font
commands would provide the ability to test if a font is available before
actually trying to typeset anything in it, and thus also the ability to
take some alternative action should the font not be available.

I know that this is more complicated with fonts than it is with input
files, since there is in general no way of testing if there is a TFM file
for the font in question short of actually trying to load the font (and I
don't think that can be used in general since it results in a visible error
message if the result of the test is false). One can however check if there
is a font definition file which defines the font in question, so that is
what I suggest the safe font commands should do.

One example of how to use them is to make a command that typesets some
symbol if that symbol is available and which typesets some fake of it
otherwise. Assuming the existence of a safe font command \UseTextSymbolIFE
(IFE=IfFontExists) with the syntax

  \UseTextSymbolIFE{<ENC>}{<YES>}{<NO>}

which is like \UseTextSymbol{<ENC>}{<YES>} if a font with encoding <ENC>
and the current family/series/shape exists, and like <NO> otherwise, one
could do

  \DeclareRobustCommand\euro{%
     \UseTextSymbolIFE{TS1}{\texteuro}{EUR}%
  }

to get a \euro command that gives something understandable regardless of
whether it is typeset on a site with or without a TS1 encoded symbol font.

Another example occurs if one needs to write temperatures---then one needs
a text minus and a text degree symbol (using math here can cause lots of
problems due to the change to Computer Modern that would be the result in
many installations). Like the euro symbol, both are available in TS1, but
if that is not available then we get into trouble. A simple way out would
be to use the declarations

  \DeclareTextCommand{\textminus}{OT1}{%
    \UseTextSymbolIFE{TS1}{\textminus}{\textendash}%
  }
  \DeclareTextCommand{\textminus}{T1}{%
    \UseTextSymbolIFE{TS1}{\textminus}{\textendash}%
  }
  \DeclareTextCommand{\textdegree}{OT1}{%
    \UseTextSymbolIFE{TS1}{\textdegree}{\char23 }%
  }
  \DeclareTextCommand{\textdegree}{T1}{%
    \UseTextSymbolIFE{TS1}{\textdegree}{\char6 }%
  }

which fake the text minus and degree using the current font's endash and
ring accent if a font with the real thing is not available. The fakes could
probably be improved, but it should be clear what they are supposed to
denote.


It seems to me that much of the code needed to implement these commands
already exists in the LaTeX kernel, in particular in \define@newfont and
\try@load@fontshape, so it should not have to be that much work
implementing them. (It should reside in the kernel, since one place one
might want to use these commands are in the definitions in an encoding
definition file, and such files cannot load a package (which would have
been the alternative place to define these commands) because the fontenc
package loads such files during option processing.)

One thing that probably would have to be introduced however is some way of
controlling how many font substitution steps (here I mean the ones caused
by the \DeclareFontSubstitution declaration, not the ones due to using the
sub size function in the font shape declaration) should be tried before the
test returns false. Clearly the font selection approach of allowing
substitution of shape, series, _and_ family is not what one wants (well,
perhaps in very extreme cases), and the best default behaviour is most
likely to not do any substitutions at all, but in some cases a shape
substitution, or even a shape and series substitution is acceptable.
Therefore it would be an advantage if some user level interface to
controlling this (perhaps as an optional argument to the safe font
commands) is provided.

Like with safe file commands, it seems reasonable to have both commands
that select the font (like the \UseTextSymbolIFE above) if it is available
and commands that do merely perform the test. In addition to the former
probably saving some typing, they can also provide some amount of
enhancement of the test: If there is a font definition for some font, but
the font still isn't there (i.e., the system is "incorrectly" set up),
these commands still have a chance to resort to the <NO> alternative, so
that the typeset document can still be acceptable.


Lars Hellström

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
July 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
July 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
March 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
November 2004
October 2004
August 2004
July 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
October 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
March 2002
December 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Universität Heidelberg | Impressum | Datenschutzerklärung

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager