Chris Rowley writes: > What we have not done yet, due to `stafff shortages', is any detailed > work on building the requirements of multi-use documents (via hyperef > or any other pakage) into the new experimental work that I am sure you > are all right now busily testing. Is it correct to assume that "multi-use" in the context of LaTeX 3 documents refers only to (1) regular latex and (2) pdflatex? If so, is it agreed that broader senses of "multi-use" would stretch LaTeX, the language (as it will be in LaTeX 3), too far? Thanks. -- Bill