On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Frank Mittelbach wrote: > this does not mean that the source input can't be in a more suitable encoding > and my suggestion is to use the LaTeX internal character representation here > (and not UTF8) but in some sense either is similarily useful since both > describe in a unique way the set of characters and both can be converted from > one into the other. I would like to suggest UTF8. First of all, they would also be usable with Omega, and second, parsing UTF8 is easier than parsing LaTeX internal character representation (LICR?). --roozbeh