On 2002-06-26 09:04:35 +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> as David pointed out the LPPL came into existance largely due to an anourmous
> amount of mail exchange (and personal discussions) with Richard; so his input
> is actually already there (and he was satisfied with it).

Fact is that the LPPL is no approved license for Sourceforge,
Savannah (which want's GPL-compatible licenses, cf.
https://savannah.gnu.org/faq/?group_id=11&question=What_is_the_registration_process.txt)
nor berlios (which want's osi approved licenses).

I know your rationale for the license, but the fact that it's not
approved by theses repositories makes life at least more
complicated than needed.

Best regards
    Martin
--
                    http://www.tm.oneiros.de