-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, The LaTeX Project is in the process of considering changes to the LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL). I have tried to summarize some of the concerns that Debian people have expressed for them, but since I don't completely agree with some of those objections, don't complete understand some others, and have yet to see a fully comprehensive review here or elsewhere, I cannot address all the issues that various people have raised. I suggest that those with concerns about the LPPL take the time to give it a hard look and put together a point-by-point review of the license. Once that's done, I (or someone else) can share that review with the LaTeX people so that they can have some hard information to go on rather than the vague rumors that ``Debian people don't like the LPPL'' or ``OSI doesn't think it's a free license'' that they have now. They can't fix problems they can't see. Thanks for your time and effort. CMC +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ Man cannot be civilised, or be kept civilised by what he does in his spare time; only by what he does as his work. W.R. Lethaby +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ C.M. Connelly [log in to unmask] SHC, DS +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE9JHgHzrFKeh3cmQ0RAkmOAJwPx0WZxoZsgxmzYrTexT/W8LK9DQCgptUr 2k2Fp5h8M+/XsuG8sJnQy+s= =Q5KH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----