Lars, >> That makes sense, but afaik the LPPL doesn't say that. However, >> I think a clear distinction should be made between the LPPL >> and the CTAN policy. CTAN won't accept a class/package whose >> name clashes with the name of an existing class/package, except >> if the author cannot be reached, etc. > > Is that actual CTAN policy, or you just thinking loud? Just thinking aloud (not only here, but in the rest of the post, too). Javier