CONTENT-TRANSFER-ENCODING: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
Envelope-to: [log in to unmask]
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:51 +0200
Received: from pop.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.138]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.6.5)
for frank@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:55:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [134.100.9.61] (helo=rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de)
by mxng03.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
id 17UBtl-0005dS-00
for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:45 +0200
Received: from sun.dante.de ([log in to unmask] [134.100.9.52])
by rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6FJqf4Y027411
for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de ([log in to unmask] [134.100.9.61])
by sun.dante.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6FJqVBn005759
for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from murphy.debian.org (murphy.debian.org [65.125.64.134])
by rzdspc1.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g6FJqR4Y027392
for <[log in to unmask]>; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 28584 invoked by uid 38); 15 Jul 2002 19:51:59 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Received: (qmail 28494 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2002 19:51:54 -0000
Received: from imailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (195.92.195.179)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Jul 2002 19:51:54 -0000
Received: from modem-104.flame-angel.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.13.104] helo=there)
by imailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 17UBsv-00019x-00
for [log in to unmask]; Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:51:54 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8318
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
List-Post: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Help: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Precedence: list
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 21:52:27 +0200 (CEST)
Resent-Message-ID: <7Kwa0C.A.Q-G.efyM9@murphy>
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Resent-Bcc:
From: Will Newton <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Motivations; proposed alternative license (was Re: LaTeX PublicProject License, Version 1.3 (DRAFT))
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 20:54:10 +0100
On Monday 15 Jul 2002 8:42 pm, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> Instead it is the wish to give preserve for LaTeX users one of the mo=
st
> fundamental features of TeX and LaTeX: the reliability that a documen=
t
> produces identical results at different sites thus allowing LaTeX to =
be
> used as an exchange media in collaborations, when preparing camera re=
ady
> copy, etc.
No amount of license changes will prevent site administrators making th=
eir=20
own changes to their LaTeX installation, and I would hope major distrib=
utors=20
would have enough respect for their users and the LaTeX community not t=
o make=20
such a gratuitous change in any case. No, I do not believe this is a go=
od=20
argument for making a package unfree.
--=20
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [log in to unmask]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble=3F Contact [log in to unmask]
bian.org