if savannah only accepts GPL then that doesn't surprise me.

what i have seen two days ago as arguments however was only the one about
not liking to rename files (which you could have pointed out is allowed as
part of the OSI as well as the debian guidelines)

have there been any new arguments?


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Schroeder [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juli 2002 10:10
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org

On 2002-07-05 13:28:22 +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> I'm trying to get the LPPL approved for at least one project
> ("case by case") at savannah.gnu.org . If anybody want's to look

And was quickly shot down. :-(

Best regards