2007/12/10, Taco Hoekwater <[log in to unmask]>: > > Biggest problem is probably a good name: > > a) \expanded would be a nice name, but it clashes with ConTeXt. > > I remember trouble with \unexpanded :-( > > b) It would belong to e-TeX, but there isn't a e-TeX prefix: > > \etexexpanded or \etexexpand > > c) pdfTeX's convention with prefix "\pdf" (see \pdfstrcmp, \pdfescape*): > > \pdfexpanded or \pdfexpand > > d) longer names > > > > My preference is c) to avoid trouble with macro name clashes. > > I can live with a), then my package etexcmds would get a > > new macro \[log in to unmask] > > Hans and I think a) would be fine. c) is somewhat silly as it is > not related to pdftex, and also a) combines nicely with the already > present \unexpanded. I agree. A patch is welcome. :-) Best Martin