On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Another quesition, I'm afraid. In the main, I get the impression :w > macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one. > However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c > (= \@nameuse). I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there > a reason for avoiding this? There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe). -- Morten