Will Robertson wrote: > > \def:Npn \store_something: {Something} > > (I prefer it without the "0" argument spec.) > I was wondering about this. For macros with no arguments, I was thinking :NNn has the advantage that the second N is "seen", whereas Npn has an invisible p argument. > > I think the philosophy is that \def:NNn and friends are designed to > create "functions", whereas tlps and the like are designed to store "data". > > So I'd choose the latter, but I'd be interested to hear the others' > opinions. That was my thought too. I only noticed after I'd sent xnotes2bib to CTAN, of course. Well, I did say "experimental". -- Joseph Wright