Morten Høgholm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Joseph Wright > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Another quesition, I'm afraid. In the main, I get the impression :w >> macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one. >> However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c >> (= \@nameuse). I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there >> a reason for avoiding this? > > There is \cs_use:c (in l3basics I believe). Ah yes. This does not show up in the copy of source3.pdf I compiled from the SVN over the weekend. Is it documented? -- Joseph Wright