On 20/10/2008, at 6:12 PM, Joseph Wright wrote: > Reading through l3basics, I see that \def_test_function_new:npn > creates > FT variants of the tests as well as TF, T and F ones. However, the FT > variant doesn't get mentioned anywhere for the tests created. Is this > needed, and if so shouldn't it be mentioned. I noticed that recently too. I think it would be better to remove that variant in the expl3 syntax, since it doesn't seem like it adds much of importance but it adds a bit of obfuscation. I mean, if you're used to true/false code to usually be {...true...}{...false...} then switching that every now and then and only indicating it by FT instead of TF is kinda hard to spot. Anyone else have additional thoughts? W