On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been writing a talk about LaTeX3, and something struck me. Why is it > \exp_after:NN and no \exp_after:NO? Or even \exp_args:NO, which saves us a char. (In fact, we could drop the "s" in all of the \exp_args functions and save us another...) I guess \exp_after:NN is an edge-case of the naming scheme. In fact, it should probably be called \exp_after:ww because in a case like this: \foo\expandafter{\bar} the opening brace doesn't really qualify as a "N" type argument. Morten and Frank (and others), is this something that we need to address? Will