On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Joseph Wright
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been writing a talk about LaTeX3, and something struck me.  Why is it
> \exp_after:NN and no \exp_after:NO?

Or even \exp_args:NO, which saves us a char. (In fact, we could drop
the "s" in all of the \exp_args functions and save us another...)

I guess \exp_after:NN is an edge-case of the naming scheme. In fact,
it should probably be called \exp_after:ww because in a case like
this:
  \foo\expandafter{\bar}
the opening brace doesn't really qualify as a "N" type argument.

Morten and Frank (and others), is this something that we need to address?

Will