Will Robertson wrote: > Hello, > > Packages (or "modules") in the expl3 bundles use the l3doc class for > documentation in the tradition of ltxdoc. Up until now, l3doc was > provided as a straight .cls file, which was in a bit of a mess. > > This evening I was a little tired, so rather than attempting to write > any actual code (or work on my thesis), I bundled l3doc.cls into a > proper .dtx file and tidied it up somewhat. It's now a bit more > readable, and I managed to remove some code that was duplicated > elsewhere or was otherwise not really being used. > > One maybe big change, though: it now loads the full expl3 suite and > declares itself as an "ExplClass". It doesn't actually use much LaTeX3 > code, yet, but this is a change from some time ago when the > documentation for the LaTeX3 code could still be compiled using LaTeX2e. > > If there's any problem with this, please let me know and I'll reverse > my decision. > > *** > > Meanwhile, if any members of this list would like to volunteer with > maintaining this class, it would be wonderful to create a Franken- > monster of l3doc, hypdoc, xdoc, and gmdoc. What little time I have > available now I'm spending on the expl3 test suite, so I suspect > without outside help this class will remain a patchwork of hacked- > together code to support whatever markup we happen to want/need while > writing the expl3 modules. You might consider throwing the docmfp package into the mix as well. Peter W.