Hi Will, > I know you've written about this before, but I think I've lost the > post (or rather, never received it and read it through the archives at > some stage) where you go into detail about your thoughts on this > matter. I'll try to find them. Right now I'm hearing Berg's Wozzeck, so I'm not sure I'n in the mood ;-). But one of my concerns was related to the number of specifications: > probably the time to discuss things again. I think the recent letters > by Morten, Joseph and I on the different "argument specifications" > showed that there are many different cases to consider, and also lots > of scope for different solutions. Many, too many. This might lead to a combinatorial explosion. Another point was the inconsistency in the prefix identifying the module (I proposed something like \module:name:suffix, but I'm not sure this is feasible because how : is handled). (Unfortunately I'm busy and very likely I'll be busy in the near future, and I'm a lot more interested in LaTeX + LuaTeX, to be honest.) Javier ----------------------------- http://www.tex-tipografia.com