Will Robertson wrote: >> Actually, for the moment I've simply not used any space skipping at all. >> >> Of course, TeX skips spaces after the command name itself, but for >> something like: >> >> \foo{arg1}[arg2]{arg3} >> >> it seemed easier to explain if there is no space skipping at a LaTeX >> level. If other people disagree it is easy to change. > > Ah, right. Well, it's hard to explain either way, I think; e.g., > > \foo{a} {b} {c} % works > \bar{a} [b] {c} % does not > > Personally, I liked xparse-alt's original method, but I'm happy to leave > it like this until complaints start coming in :) (Which I'm not sure > will happen.) I'm not too fussed either way: it was just easier to code the way it is done. How do others view this? I can soon put the auto-magic back if that is the consensus. -- Joseph Wright