Will Robertson a écrit : > I've written a couple of packages using gmdoc (pstool and asyfig, off > the top of my head), and the feeling I get when opening up the source > and seeing empty lines and no '% \begin{macrocode}' is quite > refreshing. The code is easier to come back to because there's a lot > less visual cruft (which is easy enough to ignore while writing the code > the first time). > That's exactly my impression: I can cope fairly well with dtx while writing for the first time, but find it more difficult to edit afterwards. > The only attempt at this so far have been to output a list of commands > defined in the package, if desired, in an external file \jobname.cmds. > That's already a first step :-) > My feeling so far is that since we're writing free-form documentation in > LaTeX plus the little structured pieces of information (e.g., function > names and a description of their arguments) it makes more sense to > export the desired structured parts as the document is compiled. > I agree. Maybe it would be good to make the structured part a bit more important, this certainly needs quite a bit of thinking... Manuel.