Am 11.01.2012 22:16, schrieb Joseph Wright: > On 31/12/2011 23:09, Joseph Wright wrote: >> 1) How should we refer to catcode in documentation, both in terms of >> the text and the formatting (for example, do we want to say >> something line 'category code<other>')? > > Unless I hear that there are strong objections, I propose to make a > change here as I indicate above, using the name of each category code as > described in the naming of \char_set_catcode_... and using formatting > > category code \meta{<description>}~(<code>) well, I'm not sure I parse this line. To me "code" implies more a number than something like "other". I'm fine with statements like "character category <other>" but less so with "category code <other>" or is the above to read as category code \meta{other} (12) >> 2) What should we do for \char_show_value_catcode:n? 'show_value' is >> not the right name for showing a symbolic meaning. I guess we just >> use \prg_case_int:nnn to actually show the meaning. if you want to go for symbolic then you could have \char_show_category:n {x} -> <letter> and drop "code" from the cs name cheers frank