'ello. :) > The team intend to modify the existing \<thing>_case:nnn functions, > renaming the last argument as 'F'. This reflects the fact that this > final argument is used only when the test case (<thing>-dependent) is > logically false, and follows the approach used elsewhere. From a Futurama episode, "I have no strong feelings one way or the other." :) > At the same time, we intend to introduce \<thing>_case:nn, where > there is no false branch (i.e. where 'do nothing' is the appropriate > action). I 100% support this effort. :) I just prefer "default branch" or "else branch" instead of "false branch". Ouch, too much branches. :) All the best, Paulo Em 07-07-2013 13:03, Joseph Wright escreveu: > Hello all, > > The team intend to modify the existing \<thing>_case:nnn functions, > renaming the last argument as 'F'. This reflects the fact that this > final argument is used only when the test case (<thing>-dependent) is > logically false, and follows the approach used elsewhere. At the same > time, we intend to introduce \<thing>_case:nn, where there is no false > branch (i.e. where 'do nothing' is the appropriate action). > -- > Joseph Wright >