On 17/07/2013 10:39, Michiel Helvensteijn wrote: >> Well, there are very many conditionals in expl3, and experience has >> shown that the specifiers T and F are useful for visibility (they >> would be even if we only provided the TF versions of conditionals and >> not both T and F too). > > Oh, I love T and F. > > Slightly off-topic question: why are there no FT variants? I've > encountered situations where it would have made the control flow a lot > more readable. This is certainly not critical but also, I expect, > quite painless to add. At one point we did have a few, but it overall seemed clearer to go with always having the T branch first, if at all. No technical reasons. -- Joseph Wright