On 5/27/14, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 27/05/2014 16:58, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
>> I tend to agree with you that we should not let \__dim_strip_pt:n and
>> \__dim_strip_bp:n accept arbitrary junk.  That's easy to change, as
>> they are only used internally.  On the other hand, the public
>> \dim_to_pt:n and \dim_to_unit:n are documented as allowing multiple
>> units, for the use-case Joseph describes.
>
> If you look over the current actual uses in the LaTeX kernel, they are
> focussed purely on some aspects of font use. I suspect we'd be better,
> long-term, to allow this sort of thing if at all only at the interface
> layer, and to have all of the 'general' code stuff expect 'well defined'
> dimensions. Means a doc change, but I feel an reasonable one.

My worry is not about doc changes, but about people who might be using
\dim_to_pt:n "in the wild".  We'd be breaking code.  Can we have a
deprecation period?

Bruno