On 03/07/2014 12:33, David Carlisle wrote: > On 03/07/2014 09:16, Joseph Wright wrote: >> 3. Are these more complex possibilities needed for \coffins_...? >> (Currently there is only \coffin_resize:Nnn.) > > I suspect not, a classic box just has three associated lengths so that > pretty much determines > the "packaged" resize combinations. > > But for a coffin the equivalent of height/depth is really the y > coordinates of any handle > relative to the total height; and width similarly can be split by the x > coordinate of any handle > thus I think there are too many possibilities to wrap these in simple > named commands and the caller > will need to calculate the scale factors required. > > David Good points and a handily defensible position :-) -- Joseph Wright