On 03/07/2014 08:47, Alexander Grahn wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:25:59AM +0100, Joseph Wright wrote: >> On 28/06/2014 14:04, Alexander Grahn wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:55:58PM +0930, Will Robertson wrote: >>>> On 27 Jun 2014, at 10:21 pm, Alexander Grahn <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The existing \box_resize:Nnn resizes width and totalheight, but I am >>>>> looking for resizing width and height. >>>>> >>>>> There is a \box_resize_to_ht_plus_dp:Nn, but \box_resize_to_ht:Nn is >>>>> missing. >>>> >>>> Hi Alexander, >>>> >>>> I’ve added this function to l3candidates for consideration — it sounds like a sensible request to me. >>> >>> Thanks, Will. >>> >>> The direct l3 counterpart of >>> >>> \resizebox{<h-size>}{<v-size>} >>> >>> is missing too, since >>> >>> \box_resize:Nnn<box>{<h-size>}{<v-size>} is >>> >>> actually >>> >>> \resizebox*{<h-size>}{<v-size>} >>> >>> that is, after resizing, the box' totalheight is set to <v-scale>, >>> thus, something like \box_resize_to_wd_and_ht:Nnn to set width and >>> height. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alexander. >> >> If we are having one here we should have the other: I'll add. > > Thanks a lot for taking it into consideration. > > Alexander This will be in the next release. Three questions: 1. Is this urgent (I can do a release if required)? 2. Does it still make sense to have the 'basic' function as equivalent to "wd_and_ht_plus_dp", and if so do we need the latter as a equivalent 'systematic' function? 3. Are these more complex possibilities needed for \coffins_...? (Currently there is only \coffin_resize:Nnn.) -- Joseph Wright