On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:16:32AM +0100, Joseph Wright wrote: >On 03/07/2014 08:47, Alexander Grahn wrote: >> Hi Joseph, >> >> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:25:59AM +0100, Joseph Wright wrote: >>> On 28/06/2014 14:04, Alexander Grahn wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:55:58PM +0930, Will Robertson wrote: >>>>> On 27 Jun 2014, at 10:21 pm, Alexander Grahn <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The existing \box_resize:Nnn resizes width and totalheight, but I am >>>>>> looking for resizing width and height. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a \box_resize_to_ht_plus_dp:Nn, but \box_resize_to_ht:Nn is >>>>>> missing. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alexander, >>>>> >>>>> I’ve added this function to l3candidates for consideration — it sounds like a sensible request to me. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Will. >>>> >>>> The direct l3 counterpart of >>>> >>>> \resizebox{<h-size>}{<v-size>} >>>> >>>> is missing too, since >>>> >>>> \box_resize:Nnn<box>{<h-size>}{<v-size>} is >>>> >>>> actually >>>> >>>> \resizebox*{<h-size>}{<v-size>} >>>> >>>> that is, after resizing, the box' totalheight is set to <v-scale>, >>>> thus, something like \box_resize_to_wd_and_ht:Nnn to set width and >>>> height. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Alexander. >>> >>> If we are having one here we should have the other: I'll add. >> >> Thanks a lot for taking it into consideration. >> >> Alexander > >This will be in the next release. Three questions: > > 1. Is this urgent (I can do a release if required)? As for me, there is no rush. I guess `graphics' will continue to be loaded automatically by expl3 in the medium term. So, in my package, I am using \resizebox directly for the missing cases. Alexander