Le 16/07/2015 22:43, David Carlisle a écrit : > On 16/07/2015 20:58, Élie Roux wrote: >>> if >>> the luatexbase maintainers agree, input ltluatex and fill any gaps, but >>> it may be by the time we are done, there are no gaps that need filling. >> >> I'm in favor of the global idea, the best would be that the only >> compatibility layer needed is >> >> luatexbase = latex >> >> in lua... > > er that seemed an unnecessary hurdle, and the code also runs in plain > (now) so the current suggestion (as checked in to github) is that we use > luatexbase table (and have removed "latex error" and other latexisms > from the core). Your thoughts on that change welcome.... This really seems good! It's kind of a relief to see that it finally happens, I admit I was a bit frustrated a few years ago when I tried to make it into the format (which was the initial purpose of luatexbase) and got in front of a closed door! Thank you, -- Elie