Joseph pointed out: https://github.com/TeX-Live/texlive-source. It's good that TeX-Live is using github. I'm particularly pleased by https://travis-ci.org/TeX-Live/texlive-source. I don't recall seeing this before - a recent addition? However, as Joseph points out, perhaps not a suitable place for the present discussion. On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Joseph Wright < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > On 06/05/2018 12:17, Jonathan Fine wrote: > >> Juergen points out that changing bibtex mind break things. I'd like to >> ask, >> is this the right place for the present discussion? >> >> According to https://www.latex-project.org/latex3/code/, the present list >> "is intended solely for discussing ideas and concepts for future versions >> of LaTeX". >> >> According to http://tug.org/bibtex/, the mailing list for [bibtex] bugs >> and >> discussion is at http://tug.org/pipermail/biblio/ >> >> There are github repositories for biber and biblatex. >> https://github.com/plk/biblatex >> https://github.com/plk/biber >> >> I think putting the current source for bibtex up on github would be a good >> first step for Oren being able to do the right thing for bibtex. And it >> might provide a better place for carrying out the present discussion. >> > > In terms of the source code for the BibTeX binary, the TeX Live SVN > sources area (which acts as a 'home' for a number of programs) is available > in a mirrored form on GitHub: https://github.com/TeX-Live/texlive-source. > Notably, that allows one to fiddle about with sources and see if they still > build: it's set up for CI testing. Of course, the current discussion is > likely not at the level of detailed code changes. > > (Some of the discussion here applies to the standard .bst files: those are > I think simply in [texmf]/bibtex/bst/base, so again in the TL SVN but the > 'Master' part, which is too big for GitHub.) > > Joseph >