Sebastian Rahtz wrote -- > > But is it as useful to the research physicists? (I have no idea.) > if their stuff gets in there, yes; Science Direct is as good or better > than xxx, isnt it? Ask a physicist (there's enough of them around the TeX world:-). And remind me how I access Science Direct so that I can check it out. > > > In what units: are Elsevier prepared to reveal their data on such things? > > well, we publish (say) 1200 journals, at (say) an average of 50 > articles a year, so say 6000 articles a year? 10000? is that a lot? Not necessarily, if it is over a wide area of science. This is getting a bit off subject for this list (my fault): althogh I would recommend people to look at eg xxx.lanl.gov to see "TeX in Action". chris